There has been plenty of speculation that the leaker might have been one of the Supreme Court justices or a spouse of one of the justices. Supreme Court has fallen to historic lows.
Poll after poll is showing that public approval of the U.S. READ MORE: The Supreme Court's war on the future: 17 of the Roberts Court's worst decisions People should really (consider) listening to me when I tell them how brazenly hackish and corrupt the current Supreme Court ruling class is.” Welp, the report's out and, what do you know, they don't know who did it…. Mystal wrote, “I told everybody, from the very beginning, that if the Dobbs leaker turned out to be a Republican, the Supreme Court would somehow never find who did it. And he wasn’t shy about expressing his total disdain for the Court’s radical-right majority. Legal expert Elie Mystal, a frequent guest on MSNBC and writer for The Nation, reacted to the High Court’s report in a scathing January 19 Twitter thread. Whether the ‘employees’ who were subjected to the investigation includes the justices themselves remains unclear, and the speculation amongst legal industry commentators is that the nine were not included in the search for the leaker - and it certainly doesn’t include any of their spouses.” The report seems to suggest the scope of the investigation was limited to Court employees…. You’ll recall, shortly after the leaked draft decision, getting to the heart of the leak seemed to be the focus for many in the legal industry - even in the face of a curtailment of rights that has had disastrous ramifications across the nation. Reporting for Above the Law, attorney Kathryn Rubino explains, “Let me cut directly to the chase - it’s basically a giant shrug emoji…. Supreme Court - after months of complaining about how egregious the leak was - said it couldn’t determine where the leak came from. And many of them find it “ridiculous” that the U.S. Legal experts and media pundits have had a lot to say about the investigation results. READ MORE: 'Really not an investigation': Chief justice blasted over 'sham' probe's failure to find abortion ruling leaker No one confessed to publicly disclosing the document, and none of the available forensic and other evidence provided a basis for identifying any individual as the source of the document.” The Court announced, “It is not possible to determine the identity of any individual who may have disclosed the document or how the draft opinion ended up with Politico. And the Court still didn’t know who had leaked Alito’s draft opinion in Dobbs to Politico. The Court’s final decision in Dobbs confirmed what Politico had reported on May 2.Īn investigation followed the leak, and on Januover eight months after Politico’s bombshell reporting - the High Court finally released the results of that investigation. Defenders of abortion rights hoped the Court would somehow change its mind, but that didn’t happen Roe - and by extension, Planned Parenthood v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Politico published a leaked draft opinion by Justice Samuel Alito that outlined the High Court’s reasons for overturning Roe v. Supreme Court, on June 24, 2022, officially released its ruling in Dobbs v.
0 kommentar(er)
